Information security/
Propaganda & secrecy v. information & transparency
President Barack Obama promised a
"transparent" administration, reviving democracy by letting Americans
see into the inner workings of their government as much as possible, an
implicit criticism of the excessive secrecy of his predecessor, George W. Bush.
But instead, Obama's presidency has been one of the most opaque and deceptive
in modern history.
Not only has Obama continued to wrap the carry-over
anti-terrorism wars in maximum secrecy but he has taken unprecedented steps to
shut down leaks by prosecuting whistleblowers who talk to the press. And, he
has left standing his administration's misleading rushes to judgment on key
issues after U.S. intelligence analysts have refined or reversed the first
impressions.
Whether on the Syrian sarin attack in 2013 or pivotal incidents in the
Ukraine crisis -- who was behind the sniper attacks in Kiev last Feb. 20 and
who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 last July 17 -- Obama has withheld
evidence developed by U.S. government analysts rather than undercut the
propaganda value of the initial accusations.
No comments:
Post a Comment