Страницы

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Information security/ Propaganda & secrecy v. information & transparency

President Barack Obama promised a "transparent" administration, reviving democracy by letting Americans see into the inner workings of their government as much as possible, an implicit criticism of the excessive secrecy of his predecessor, George W. Bush. But instead, Obama's presidency has been one of the most opaque and deceptive in modern history.
Not only has Obama continued to wrap the carry-over anti-terrorism wars in maximum secrecy but he has taken unprecedented steps to shut down leaks by prosecuting whistleblowers who talk to the press. And, he has left standing his administration's misleading rushes to judgment on key issues after U.S. intelligence analysts have refined or reversed the first impressions.
Whether on the Syrian sarin attack in 2013 or pivotal incidents in the Ukraine crisis -- who was behind the sniper attacks in Kiev last Feb. 20 and who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 last July 17 -- Obama has withheld evidence developed by U.S. government analysts rather than undercut the propaganda value of the initial accusations.



No comments:

Post a Comment