White House Advisory Council Report Is Critical of Forensics Used in Criminal Trials
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology released a final report Tuesday on forensics, concluding that much of the most common analysis used in criminal trials doesn’t meet scientific standards.
The final document nearly mirrored a draft report reviewed by The Wall Street Journal that raised questions about the use of bite-mark, hair, footwear, firearm and tool-mark analysis as evidence in thousands of trials annually in state and federal courts.
It sets the stage for criminal-defense challenges of long-held evidentiary methods and promises increased courtroom battles with prosecutors over the use of expert witnesses.
The final document nearly mirrored a draft report reviewed by The Wall Street Journal that raised questions about the use of bite-mark, hair, footwear, firearm and tool-mark analysis as evidence in thousands of trials annually in state and federal courts.
It sets the stage for criminal-defense challenges of long-held evidentiary methods and promises increased courtroom battles with prosecutors over the use of expert witnesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment