Geoengineering

7 Geoengineering Solutions That Might Cause More Damage Than Good

Today we celebrate World Geology Day and nothing makes more sense than to stop for a few minutes and reflect on some good old geoengineering solutions that we have devised for the betterment of humanity. How good are these solutions?

Can they do more harm than good in the long run? Today, we will check out the top 7 geoengineering solutions that might be primed for a failure! But first, let us answer a few vital questions!

Geoengineering, in simple terms, can be defined as the manipulation of a particular process or a number of processes on a large scale in order to control the climate of the Earth. The purpose of these experiments is to get some form of benefit out of them in view of the global climate scenario.

Therefore, geoengineering or climate engineering, in other words, aims to intervene in the world’s natural systems in order to combat climate change directly and effectively.       

Geoengineering schemes are essentially projects that are designed to tackle some of the most dangerous effects of climate change. These schemes work towards restricting the amount of sunlight that reaches the surface of the planet or eliminating carbon dioxide from the air.

Although most critics claim that geoengineering is not a realistic idea, countless geoengineering solutions suggest otherwise.